Types of Fieldwork
The following is a summary of the main types of fieldwork that
that are undertaken in Worcestershire.
Desk-Top Assessments
The first stage in many archaeological projects is to collate
the existing information that exists about a particular site. This
will be used as the basis for devising a strategy for any future
work at the site. A key element of this is the information
contained within the County Historic Environment Record. Other
important information may come from a study of aerial
photographs.
Watching Briefs and Salvage Recording
The most minimal form of fieldwork is simply to seek permission
for an archaeologist to observe groundworks on a building site.
Typically this will be arranged through an Access Condition on a
planning permission but may also cover observation on other types
of site or activity where the archaeologist is totally reliant on
the co-operation of the landowner. A rapid record is made of any
discoveries without holding up the development work in any way. A
watching brief might be undertaken in an area where little
information has been gathered in the past, or where the development
is so small that it is not reasonable to require any larger input.
The main purpose is to establish whether any archaeology exists on
the site. This information can then be used to prepare better
advice for any neighbouring developments in the future.
This is similar to a watching brief but with the big difference
that a planning condition might place the responsibility for
appointing a suitable archaeological contractor and of funding such
work with the developer.
The speed with which such work has to be undertaken, and the
need to take account of health and safety issues when working on a
building site, means that special skills have had to be developed
to extract the maximum degree of information.
A contingency allowance of time and resources may have been
agreed between the archaeologist and developer to allow for the
possibility that significant remains might be found on
site.
A decision might be made at the initial planning application
stage to recommend salvage recording, or this might follow the
results of an Evaluation.
Evaluation
An evaluation
may consist of a package different types of work, following an
initial desk-top assessment. The evaluation will be designed to
provide sufficient information to give accurate advice to the local
authorities before the Councillors have to decide to approve, or
reject, a planning application. The responsibility for
commissioning and funding such an evaluation lies with the
developer. Typically the project might consist of one or more of
the following: fieldwalking, geophysical survey, sample excavation.
Most excavation that is currently undertaken in England is in the
form of small-scale evaluation trenches.
These are
not research excavations and they have limited goals; for example,
they aim to establish the presence/absence of any archaeology and
assessing its significance. From the results of the evaluation the
County Archaeologist will then recommend future policy towards the
site.
Decisons will range from deciding to take no further action,
recommending a watching brief or salvage recording, suggesting
changes to design, further excavation or, in extremely rare cases,
even recommending that the application be refused.
Where an evaluation reveals the existence of an important
archaeological site, the priority is to try to find ways of
avoiding further damage. Typically, this might be achieved by
moving a proposed building away from critical archaeology or
altering the foundation design. Sometimes, however, it is agreed
that the best course of action is to accept that the site, or part
of it, will be destroyed but to at least ensure that at least an
adequate record will be made of it. This may lead to a large
excavation.
In other circumstances a research excavation might be organised
on a non-threatened site to try to understand a particular part of
our heritage and also to provide training for the next generation
of archaeologists.
Large-scale excavations are particularly important because they
offer the best chance to compare large assemblages of finds,
recover complete plans of structures and also to understand the
relationship between neighbouring blocks of property. They are,
however, expensive to undertake - not just in the fieldwork but in
the complex process of analysing, and publishing, the
results.
This page was last reviewed 16 March 2012 at 15:20.
The page is next due for review 12 September 2013.